If you've ever dabbled in magic tricks or have a friend who has, you might have heard about the simple magician's rule, "Only let them see what you want them to see." The truth is, that rule is not limited to magic tricks. Writers use that tool daily. To write a good book, the author must tell a specific story without revealing the secrets of the developing plot. In other words, they must pick the point of view and narration that best conveys the story they want told. The best method for telling the story depends on the genre of the story and the point the author is trying to make. You can have two identical copies of the same plot, characters, and setting, but the second you choose a different point of view or narrative style, a new story is born. So what is the deal with all these different methods, and how are they best utilized?
First Person
First person is probably the easiest point of view to write and is common with stories relying heavily on emotion. In this point of view, a character in the story becomes the narrator, and everything is seen through his/her eyes. The reader is shown the character's emotions, opinions, and life events, making the story rather subjective. As such, using this type of narration leaves the author open to purposely lead the reader astray. For this reason, first person narrators are not always trustworthy. This point of view is handy for writing intimate stories, such as mysteries or romance novels.
Second Person
A second person point of view is rarely used when writing modern fiction; however it is still used frequently in television. It is equivalent to what is called an "aside," a tool used primarily in earlier dramatic plays. Asides were short speeches, or soliloquies, in which the character addressed the audience directly with his/her thoughts. A second person point of view breaks the fourth wall so to speak, just as the asides in plays did, and gives the reader some extra insight into the story from time to time. However, in modern fiction books, most authors opt out of this style of writing. Many see it as less desirable since it breaks the reader's connection with the story, rendering it more objective. However, one type of literature that is still commonly written in second person is a personal diary. When stories of this type are recounted, fiction or non-fiction, the second person narration is the most viable point of view to use.
Third Person
Third person point of view is the most flexible, and is therefore the most frequently used of all viewpoints. In this point of view, the narrator is an unspecified entity following the main character(s) as the events of the story unfold. Third person singular is most common, whereby the narrator refers to the characters in the story as he or she, but a plural third person (they) is also an option. Third person can be subjective or objective, and it can also be limited or omniscient.
Objective
Objective narrators have no direct involvement in the story and tell a completely unbiased version. They never state more than can be inferred from observable events and dialogue. No thoughts, opinions, or emotions of any kind are given about any of the characters. The narrator remains completely detached. This type of writing is difficult to master, as it's a strictly show-all-and-never-tell style of narration, but it can be very powerful when done well. Books of the thriller genre are best suited for this type of narration.
Omniscient
Omniscient narrators are all-knowing about all the characters. They know what every person thinks and feels, and is aware of all their motives. This narrative style allows the author to jump between each of the characters' minds throughout the story. It is often coupled with the third person point of view and can be objective or subjective.
Limited Omniscient
Limited omniscient is similar to omniscient with the exception of the narrator only having insight to a limited number of characters' thoughts/feelings. It is also usually paired with the third person point of view but is usually subjective.
Tense/Diction
Tense deals with the time of events having occurred, and diction refers to the vocabulary and speaking style used by the author in a book. Both relate strongly to the type of story being told and the author's particular writing style. Present tense, which is more common in short stories, has sort of a flattened emotional narrative style and increases distance between the author and the reader, often making the reader less sympathetic of a character. The objective feel of this tense can be to an author's advantage depending on the story, particularly if the author doesn't want the reader to take the side of the main character. This is especially true if the main character is the antagonist rather than the protagonist. I've personally written a couple of stories this way, and I can tell you that it does work well in certain situations. It's not a great style choice for every story though.
The more commonly used tense is past. It gives the reader a more personal connection with the characters, and it flows naturally. It's less choppy and awkward than present tense, making it more pleasant to read and write.
Choice of diction depends on the genre of the story, setting of the story, and characters. The most diction differences are seen within dialogue, but the narration of a story can have an unusual diction to it as well. For instance, I've read some works of fiction that take place in the southern part of the U.S. where the author chose to write with a southern diction for the whole book. It wasn't my particular cup of tea, but it worked well for the story being told. Likewise, if you're writing a book about medieval times, it makes sense to use the language that they would have used when telling the story. The same is true for non-fiction, particularly with guides and how-to books. Certain technical and slang terms would be expected in these.
Whichever tense and diction you decide to use, make sure it matches the story being told. There is nothing more annoying than reading an excessively wordy book or one that uses incorrect terms/facts for that genre or era.
Make Every Scene Count: Beginning with a Bang
Writing the First Draft
When planning the opening scene for a story, there are two approaches you can take: a direct approach and a subtle approach. The direct approach is the option most writers take. The so-called action of a story begins immediately, and the reader is submersed in the world created by the author, usually alongside the center character(s). The subtle approach, though less often used, can actually be just as effective if executed well. It involves starting with a seemingly normal scene that soon reveals unusual circumstances, objects, etc. A story of this nature is often told in limited omniscient point of view (though not always), starting big and zooming in on a scene.
One you've chosen your method, it's best to get right to the action. And no, that doesn't mean that you have to start with the stereotypical action scene. As I stated previously, you can choose a rather normal scene with some oddities. The key is to start with a place where the plot is progressing and not with backstory; you can weave backstory in later. Movement should be your focus; as long as the plot is developing, your readers will be interested.
The other thing you want to avoid is commonly occurring scenes for the particular genre you're writing. For instance, if you're writing a mystery, don't feel that you have to riddle the opening scene with death. You could have an investigator studying an almost-closed case where he realizes something is wrong. You could have a convicted felon escape from prison with some inside help. You could have an investigator stumble on to what he thinks is a case only to have it be a bust. The point is, there are numerous ways to tackle a common genre without giving it a typical opening.
If you know the method you want to use and have an idea for a developing plot, there is only one thing left to do: write. The initial writing process is different for everyone. My personal take is to simply write and not overthink things. After all, what is written can always be erased or altered, but what isn't written won't always come back to mind later. The downside is that this makes for more editing later. Another technique is to write only what you feel is necessary in the scope of the whole book. This is certainly more difficult to do but reduces the amount of time you'll have to spend editing later on. Both strategies have their pros and cons.
The Editing Process
Once the first draft of your opening scene is staring you in the face and you're ready to tackle editing, be prepared to get down to the nitty-gritty. Here are some suggestions you might want to follow as you push through the editing process:
1. Keep an open mind. Yes, your story is your baby, and you probably don't want anyone bashing it or tearing it apart; however, if you're really eager to improve your book, know that editing is a must.
2. Get a second (and third or fourth) opinion if you can. Look to someone you trust to be honest. Getting an outsider's view on your book can prove really useful in catering to your targeted audience.
3. It's all about details. Details make or break a scene. Quite honestly, they make or break a book. The trick is to provide enough detail to paint a vivid picture but avoid excessive detail that might bore your reader or cause them to discover important plot points prematurely.
4. Only include what is essential to the plot. If a line, paragraph, or scene doesn't alter the plot or cause it to advance in any way, cut it. A good story is a natural progression of events that are told in a specific and methodical manner. The point of telling each scene should be to propel the plot forward.
5. Cut out any extraneous words. "That" is one of those words that I am guilty of overusing myself. It's the first word that I look for when weeding through unnecessary parts of my story. Here's a good rule of thumb about using it: only keep it if it's essential to the meaning of the sentence. Another example is an action like sitting down. It's obvious that you're lowering your body when you sit, rending the word down unnecessary.
6. Replace adjective/verb couplings and weak verbs with stronger verbs. Doing so makes for stronger writing and more compelling text.
7. Set goals and deadlines for yourself when editing. Editing is the part of the process that writers typically hate the most. So treat it like you would a deadline at work or school. Set a reasonable goal for what you want to accomplish in a certain time period and stick with it. Have someone hold you accountable if need be. Reward yourself when you meet your goals.
Once you've gone through the stages of writing the first draft and editing it, go through the editing process again. And again. And again. And again. Perfecting a book takes time and practice. It's very unlikely that you'll end up with the end product you want after only a few edits. A friend of mine (a fantastic writer by the way) is on at least round thirty of edits, and she's still ironing out kinks. But after reading the revisions she made, I can tell you it was worth it. Her story was transformed from great to phenomenal.
Make Every Scene Count: Introduction
Over the next couple of weeks, I'll be making posts for a new series blog of mine, "Make Every Scene Count." It will cover tips on making each scene you write a better one. The tips are meant to be tools to help you focus on which scenes are important, both in initial drafts and during the editing process. I'll cover beginning and ending scenes, action scenes, love scenes, and more. The articles will be geared toward fiction writing.